Legal Opinion

Northwestern Bank v. Barber

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1986No. 8526SC678PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred when it failed to apply the provisions of G.S. 24-8 to the evidence. G.S. 24-8 provides in pertinent part:

No lender shall charge or receive from any borrower or require in connection with a loan any borrower, directly or indirectly, to pay, deliver, transfer or convey or otherwise confer upon or for the benefit of the lender . . . any sum of money, thing of value or other consideration other than that which is pledged as security or collateral to secure the repayment of the full principal of the loan, together with fees and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Markham v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Blanton v. SiskCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Haanebrink v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Three Sisters Partners, L.L.C. v. Harden (In Re Shangra-La, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Adams v. Beard Development Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Thomas v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. In Re: Shangra-La, Incorporated, Debtor. Three Sisters Partners, L.L.C., Creditor-Appellant v. Holmes P. Harden, Trustee-In-Bankruptcy, and Marjorie K. Lynch, Bankruptcy Administrator-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API