Legal Opinion

People v. Rose

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1979No. 77-1471PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Following a jury trial, defendants were convicted of armed robbery. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 18 — 2.) Defendant Rose received a sentence of 4 to 10 years while defendant Stuckey received a sentence of 5 to 12 years. On appeal, they contend that (1) the trial court erred in refusing to allow them to use nylon stockings as demonstrative evidence, (2) that they were denied a fair trial where the State’s closing argument shifted the burden of proof to the defense, and (3) that the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial after a prosecution witness stated that he had been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The People v. WeinsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. The People v. BurageIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. The People v. NaujokasIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. The People v. BensonIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. The People v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. WinfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. People v. WallsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. People v. SummersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. People v. LesterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. People v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API