People v. Rose
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz
Following a jury trial, defendants were convicted of armed robbery. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 18 — 2.) Defendant Rose received a sentence of 4 to 10 years while defendant Stuckey received a sentence of 5 to 12 years. On appeal, they contend that (1) the trial court erred in refusing to allow them to use nylon stockings as demonstrative evidence, (2) that they were denied a fair trial where the State’s closing argument shifted the burden of proof to the defense, and (3) that the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial after a prosecution witness stated that he had been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The People v. WeinsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- The People v. BurageIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- The People v. NaujokasIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- The People v. BensonIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- The People v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. WinfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- People v. WallsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- People v. SummersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- People v. LesterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.