Legal Opinion
City of San Antonio v. Astoria
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 13, 1933No. 9389PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
The city of San Antonio instituted and prosecuted a statutory proceeding to condemn certain real property of P. A. Astoria for street widening purposes. The regularity and validity of the proceeding is not in question here.
Commissioners appointed to assess the dam-; ages for the taking of the property awarded Astoria $7,500 therefor. The city was satiát fled with the award and tendered the amount thereof to Astoria, who rejected the tender and appealed from the award.
In pursuance of the statutory procedure, the city, in order to enter into possession of the condemned property…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buffalo Bayou, Brazos & Colorado Railroad v. FerrisTexas Supreme Court · 1863
- Oliver v. Union Point & White Plains RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Ackerman v. HuffTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Blackshire v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rld.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- State ex rel. Long v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Culligan Soft Water Service v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- State v. First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Wynnewood Bank and Trust v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- City of San Antonio v. AstoriaTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Sherrill v. Brazos River Transmission Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.