Legal Opinion

People v. Bean

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 1979No. 78-875, 78-876 consPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

This is an appeal by the State, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(a) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 604(a)), of the trial court’s quashing of the arrest and suppressing of the statements of defendant, Jimmy Bean, and the quashing of the arrests and suppressing of the identifications of defendants, Frank and Jesse Byrd. The State contends that the trial court erred when it found that there was no probable cause to arrest Bean in his apartment and when it based its ruling with respect to the Byrds on this erroneous finding. We reverse and remand.

On April 29,1977, the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. People v. ClayIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. WolgemuthIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. The People v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. The People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chauncey L. Moore, Jr. v. The Marketplace Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. People v. BeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. SakalasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. People v. BafiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. People v. MontgomeryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API