Gaumont Co. v. Hatch

YOUNG, District Judge.

[1] The grounds of dismissal in this case are fivefold. The first ground is that there is a misjoinder of the parties plaintiff in that the Gaumont Company is joined with Schwalm and Rothleder, the lessees. The thirty-seventh rule in equity (198 Fed. xxviii, 115 C. C. A. xxviii) provides:

“AH persons haying an interest in the subject of the action and obtaining the relief demanded may join as plaintiffs, and any person may bo made a defendant who has or claims an interest adverse to the plaintiff.”

It appears from the allegations of the hill as amended that the Gau-mont…