Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Lesley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1983No. 18038Published

1ConcurrenceHowe, Justice

I concur in the result. However, I prefer to rest my concurrence in the denial of the defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress the evidence seized from his pack upon the ground that he has not provided us with a record by which we may review that ruling. I do not subscribe to the holding in the majority opinion that the ruling is not reviewable because the defendant failed at the trial to object to the admission of the evidence.

Rule 12 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure (codified as U.C.A., 1953, § 77-35-12) provides in pertinent part:(a) ...

*83(b) Any defense, objection or request including…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. Leo Tom HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. JaffeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1951
  4. United States v. BarlettaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980
  5. Matter of Estate of CassityUtah Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API