Legal Opinion

State v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 3, 1912No. 8173PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Before Gage, J., Abbeville, September term, 1911. Indictment against J. H. Ferguson. Defendant appeals. Mr. Bonham cites: Rule as to charging on facts: 47 S. C. 488; 87 S. C. 193. Charge in ■interrogative form: 49 S. C. 488, 553; 48 S. C. 136. Opprobrious language: 75 S. C. 510. Burden of proof in acci- ■ dental killing: 68 S. C. 304. Oral argument.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of tire Court was deliv■ered by

Mr. Justice FIydrick.

Defendant was tried for the ■murder of bis father. He was’ convicted of manslaughter, and-appeals from the sentence. Flis contention was that the killing was accidental, and also that hie was acting in self-defense, when the pistol, which he pointed at his father "to stop his deadly assault upon him, was accidentally dis Charged. At the trial, 'his mother testified' that the defendant and' his father were quarreling in defendant’s house; that she made ani assertion) to •which defendant replied: “You are a damn' lie.” This was the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McDanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. State v. RowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. OsborneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. RookSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API