Legal Opinion

Lange v. Braynard

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1894No. 18252PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

This action was originally commenced by the plaintiff against the defendants, C. P. Braynard, William Nagle, and P. M. Cleghorn, for the purpose of subjecting the land described in the complaint to the payment of a judgment theretofore recovered by plaintiff against defendant Braynard, the complaint alleging that said land had been conveyed by said Braynard to the defendant William Nagle, and by said Nagle to the defendant Cleghorn, and that said conveyances were both made without consideration, and for the purpose of delaying and defrauding the plaintiff and other creditors of the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Van Buren Bryan v. MalloySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Wood v. . SwiftNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Jenkins v. BisbeeNew York Court of Chancery · 1832

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. LintonNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Brown v. ZacharySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Munger v. YeiserNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Read v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API