Legal Opinion

Albornoz v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 1, 2023No. 1:22-cv-01229Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSICA E. ALBORNOZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-01229-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE AMENDED SCHEDULING 13 v. ORDER 14 WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., et al, (Docs. 65, 66) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is the request of Defendants Wal-Mar Associates, Inc. and Wal- 18 Mart Inc. (Defendants) to modify the operative scheduling order and extend remaining expert 19 discovery, motion filing and trial dates by approximately 90 days.1 (Docs. 65, 66). Plaintiff 20 Jessica E. Albornoz (“Plaintiff”) opposes Defendants’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. John Paul WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Marshall v. H & R Block Tax Services Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API