Legal Opinion

Hazlehurst v. Southern Fruit Distributors Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1933No. 22268PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. It is a general rule that a constitutional question should he raised in a case at the earliest opportunity at which it can be appropriately raised, or it will be considered, as having been waived. 12 C. J. 785; 6 R. C. L. 95. See also in this connection Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Michael, 172 Ga. 561 (158 S. E. 426). Whatever exceptions, if any, there may be to this rule, it would seem that where a plaintiff’s right to recover is defeated by the application of the provisions of a statute, the plaintiff could very appropriately, and should, attack the constitutionality of the statute,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Padgett v. Silver Lake Park Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Spurlock v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Benham v. HeydeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Owens v. CapriWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Grant v. McKiernanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Moreland v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Edwards v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API