Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Furleigh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1922No. 17279PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Respondent, as plaintiff, brought this action to foreclose a claim of lien for work done by him at the request of appellant Furleigh in clearing certain land belonging to appellants McMichael, Maine and Bryant. From a judgment awarding him the amount prayed for and foreclosing the lien, this appeal is prosecuted.

It appears that appellant Furleigh had a contract with the owners for the clearing of certain land at an *208agreed price, with a time limit, and that a written contract was entered into as follows:

“Contract of Employment.
“This agreement between L. S. Fnrleigh, hereinafter called the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Noyes v. PuginWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dravo Corp. v. L. W. Moses Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  2. Wise v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ahrens v. LadleyWashington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API