United States v. Aldo Malatesta
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant asks that his conviction for failure to submit to induction be set aside because (1) 204 days elapsed between his first order to report and the final date when his refusal resulted in prosecution, and (2) the board should have reopened his classification as he made out a prima facie case for 1-Y classification.
His first claim is that the board is permitted extensions of only 120 days from the original order and if the extension is beyond that time there must be a new order under 32 CFR 1632.2. United States v. Lonidier, 427 F.2d 30 (9 Cir. 1970). We find here the delay chargeable to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Langdon Smith FosterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Fred Spencer LonidierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Michael Anthony MunsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Stanley Albert KohlsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Neal Allen SheaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Alan Robert ScialabbaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972