Legal Opinion

Keene v. Schnetz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1983No. 1871PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, P.J.

Defendants-appellants Roger and Clara Schnetz appeal a trial court order entering summary judgment in favor of Maxine Keene, plaintiff-appellee, and ordering the forfeiture and sale of real property due to appellants’ default on a land contract. We affirm.

The plaintiff-appellee, Maxine Keene, is the vendor, and defendants-appellants, Roger and Clara Schnetz, are the vendees of certain real property located in Sugar Creek Township in Wayne County, Ohio. On May 21, 1977, the parties executed a land contract for the sale and purchase of the property for $175,000. Appellants paid the appellee…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Ravenswood Apartments, Ltd. (In Re Ravenswood Apartments, Ltd.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Barnett v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
  3. Am. Servicing Corp. v. WannemacherOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Chemical Bank v. SullivanOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Addair v. Mitchell, Unpublished Decision (12-15-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API