Legal Opinion

American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Marco

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 27, 1985No. 83 Civ. 573(MEL)Published

1Opinion of the Court

LASKER, District Judge.

Third-party defendant British Airways moves pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss the third party action. Max Marco and DeMarco Cal Fabrics, third-party plaintiffs (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Marco”) oppose the motion on the ground that material facts remain at issue for trial. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I

On November 9, 1982, Max Marco and his wife were passengers aboard a London to New York British Airways Concorde flight.1 Mr. and Mrs. Marco asked for and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. United States v. Berdj KeuylianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API