Legal Opinion

Maher v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1989No. Appeal 2094 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Claimant Joseph F. Maher appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board that affirmed a referee’s decision disallowing his petition for benefits filed under section 302(c)(2) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act),1 for disability resulting from asbestosis caused by his exposure to asbestos while he was employed by B.E Oil Corporation.

The central issue in the case is whether the claimant’s proof of exposure to asbestos after June 30,1973, coupled with his medical evidence relating to the cause of his *413disability, was sufficient as a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. City of Hazleton v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Pypers v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Universal Trucking, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Marcucci v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  2. Witco-Kendall Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. School District of Philadelphia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. B.P. Oil Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Hoosier Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API