Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1903No. 2709PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25 and twenty days confinement in the county jail.

Appellant reserved a number of exceptions to the introduction of the orders of the commissioners court declaring the result and putting local option into effect in said county. But said orders seem to be in proper form and in accordance with the law on the subject. The fact that the order authorizing the publication in some newspaper did not specify any particular newspaper did not invalidate the order. The law authorizes the county judge to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Bogle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Davidson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Boggus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API