Paul Hinkel Donald Reynolds v. Gordon England, Secretary, United States Navy
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge.
Appellants are GS-11 level employees of the United States Navy. They allege that the Navy determined that their jobs should be classified at the GS-12 level but has failed to implement the classification. They filed suit seeking a writ of mandamus compelling defendant Gordon England, Secretary of the Navy, to classify them accordingly. Appellants appeal the Magistrate Judge’s decision granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 1 We shall affirm.
This Court exercises plenary review over a district court’s grant of summary judgment and applies…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- In Re: Joann PatenaudepetitionersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Stehney v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Manuel Lampon-Paz v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Richard BlackstoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- WILCOX v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024