Legal Opinion

Paul Hinkel Donald Reynolds v. Gordon England, Secretary, United States Navy

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 14, 2003No. 02-4542PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge.

Appellants are GS-11 level employees of the United States Navy. They allege that the Navy determined that their jobs should be classified at the GS-12 level but has failed to implement the classification. They filed suit seeking a writ of mandamus compelling defendant Gordon England, Secretary of the Navy, to classify them accordingly. Appellants appeal the Magistrate Judge’s decision granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 1 We shall affirm.

This Court exercises plenary review over a district court’s grant of summary judgment and applies…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. In Re: Joann PatenaudepetitionersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Stehney v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manuel Lampon-Paz v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Richard BlackstoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. WILCOX v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API