Legal Opinion
In Re Searcy
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 1, 2005No. 17-41804PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE AND HOLD MORTGAGEE IN CONTEMPT
WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
After reopening her 15-year-old Chapter 13 case, Cheryl Searcy (“Debtor”) moved to compel USAlliance Federal Credit Union (“USAlliance”), successor to Progressive Consumer Federal Credit Union (“Progressive”) to discharge a mortgage originally granted by Debtor to Progressive 1 and to hold USAlliance in contempt of Debtor’s discharge order for its failure to discharge the mortgage contending that any liability to USAlliance had been discharged by the confirmation of her…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In the Matter of Phyllis Maxine Pence, Debtor. Appeal of Pacesetter Bank of MontpelierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- In the Matter of Walter Howard and Verlean Howard, Debtors. Sun Finance Company, Inc. v. Walter Howard and Verlean HowardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Three Sons, Inc. v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Piedmont Trust Bank v. Linkous (In re Linkous)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Lee Servicing Co. v. Wolf (In Re Wolf)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re GalindezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- In Re EulianoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Abiezer Ramos Gonzalez and Liz Yanelly Baez Ramirez v. Cooperativa Roosevelt RoadsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026
- FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y CreditoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023