Legal Opinion

Wilentz v. Stanger

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 11, 1943PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, J.

The appeal is by the relator from a judgment of the Supreme Court rendered on a demurrer to an information in the nature of a writ of quo warranto, the purpose of the proceeding being to oust George H. Stanger from his office as member of the state senate from the County of Cumberland.

In July of 1941 Arthur F. Foran, of the County of Hunter-don, was a member of the New Jersey Senate; also was the respondent, George H. Stanger, of the County of Cumberland. On July 15th, 1941, the legislature enacted the Milk Control Law, B. S. 4:12A-1, ei seq.;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The People Ex Rel. v. . NostrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Howard v. HarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  4. Attorney General v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Lilly v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Haskins v. State Ex Rel. HarringtonWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Barkus v. SadlochSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Chamber of Commerce E. Union Cty. v. LeoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. O'Dowd's Dairy v. HoffmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Errichetti v. MerlinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API