Legal Opinion

In re Hollis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 7, 2014No. 2013-B-2667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1251ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

|-i This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Anthony Hollis, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.

PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY

Before we address the current charges, we find it helpful to review respondent’s prior disciplinary history. Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana in 1985. He was admonished in 1994 and 1998 for failing to cooperate with the ODC. In 1998, this court suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  4. In re DonnanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ChatelainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re HollisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  2. In re HollisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API