Legal Opinion

Warren Foundry & Pipe Corp. v. Board of Water Commissioners of Village of Ossining

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBleakley, J.

The plaintiff in the New York action as a matter of orderly procedure should have pleaded by cross-answer his affirmative claim against the village of Ossining. The amount due him is directly in issue in the Westchester county suit. The actions will be consolidated because, not only can the issue between him and the village be settled, but such a judgment will determine finally the amount to be applied toward the liens and the deficiency against the surety company, if any. The motion is granted in all respects.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foundry & Pipe Corp. v. Village of OssiningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Gitter v. SchiffNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. D'Angelo v. Hanruth Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Haber v. Chase National Bank of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Simon v. WaltmanNew York Supreme Court · 1945