Legal Opinion

United States v. Malacara

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 10, 2012No. 12-0643/AFPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CCA 38024. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that the convening authority failed to comply with a lawful term of the pretrial agreement in that he did not dismiss with prejudice Charge III and its specifications as required by that agreement. See United States v. Smead, 68 M.J. 44, 62 (C.A.A.F. 2009). Absent the presence of any circumstances to cancel the agreement, the convening authority’s action improperly failed to give Appellant the benefit that he bargained for — dismissal with prejudice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SmeadCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  2. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WolcottUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API