Legal Opinion

State v. Casby

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 2005No. Nos. 2005-K-1181, 2005-K-1222, 2005-K-1223, 2005-K-1237PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judge MICHAEL E. KIRBY.

IsThese four writs have been consolidated because they present a single issue: Whether civil commitment procedures apply to criminal defendants who have been found incompetent to proceed for the foreseeable future.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE:

In No.2005-K-1181 the defendant Casby was charged in the Criminal District Court with two counts of aggravated crime against nature, pleaded not guilty and was later found incompetent to proceed. Two years later the court found that his competency would not be restored in the foreseeable future and ordered that the commitment be converted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Lockhart v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. State v. DensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Grayer v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. Pourciau v. East Louisiana State Hosp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MorganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API