Legal Opinion

United States v. William L. Hart

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1996No. 92-2144PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

In one of the saddest, yet most egregious cases of public corruption to come before this court in recent years, Defendant-Appellant William L. Hart, the former Chief of Police for the City of Detroit, appeals his conviction for embezzlement and filing false income tax returns. Upon careful consideration of the record before this court and the oral arguments, we conclude that appellant’s arguments are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence in their entirety.

I

Many of the facts relevant to this case are set out in two previously…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Joe W. Fountain (92-1507) Carlton B. McEaddy (92-1866)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Lawrence Douglas Todd, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Paul J. SavoieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In Re DownsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Elie F. Abboud (04-3942) and Michel Abboud (04-3943)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. David Devon DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Flagg Ex Rel. J.B. v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Philip A. ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API