Stewart v. State ex rel. Fulton
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*59OPINION
By HORNBECK, PJ.
The error claimed by Laura V. Bates is that the court erred in sustaining the motion of the plaintiff for a directed verdict. She insists that she took title to the real estate which she purchased under the first deed from the assignee; that she did not assume and agree to pay the mortgage to the Bank; that she had no knowledge that her second deed so provided and that upon the whole record the question whether or not she assumed ^the mortgage was one of fact which should have been presented to thq jury.
The trial court held that the confirma.tion of sale was a judgment,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norton v. Nebraska Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Hickson v. RuckerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
- Redd v. DyerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Podesta v. BinnsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
3Cited by1 opinion
- Davis v. the American Rolling Mills Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936