Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State ex rel. Fulton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1935No. 221PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*59OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

The error claimed by Laura V. Bates is that the court erred in sustaining the motion of the plaintiff for a directed verdict. She insists that she took title to the real estate which she purchased under the first deed from the assignee; that she did not assume and agree to pay the mortgage to the Bank; that she had no knowledge that her second deed so provided and that upon the whole record the question whether or not she assumed ^the mortgage was one of fact which should have been presented to thq jury.

The trial court held that the confirma.tion of sale was a judgment,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norton v. Nebraska Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hickson v. RuckerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  3. Redd v. DyerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  4. Podesta v. BinnsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. the American Rolling Mills Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API