Legal Opinion

Cullen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1986No. 332-84PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Judge.

The Gaskin rule provides that when a State’s witness has made a report or has given a statement prior to testifying, the defendant, after a timely request, is entitled to inspect and use such prior available report or statement for cross-examination and impeachment purposes, even though the witness may not have used the instrument to refresh his memory. Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 7, 353 S.W.2d 467 (1961); Pinson v. State, 598 S.W.2d 299 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Mendoza v. State, 552 S.W.2d 444 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Zanders v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gaskin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Mendoza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Hoffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Corbett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Newsome v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API