Legal Opinion
Major v. Kollmorgen Optical Corp.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided February 13, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.
The contract upon which this action is based and for the alleged breach of which by the defendant the plaintiff seeks damages, is contained in two letters written by defendant to plaintiff, in which the defendant promised to pay plaintiff certain commissions on orders placed by plaintiff for defendant’s merchandise. The sole question in this and in other cases of a like nature, is whether the contract is void for lack of mutuality. Such a lack exists, where one is bound and the other is not. (Good*220year v. Koehler Sporting Goods Co., 159 App. Div. 116.) Unless both parties to a contract are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Peter Cooper's Glue FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Goodyear v. H. J. Koehler Sporting Goods Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Wallach v. MendelsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kelble Operating Corp. v. Jarka Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937