Legal Opinion

Sturkie v. Sifly

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 17, 1984No. 0081PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

The appellant receiver instituted this suit premised upon a common law action to pierce the corporate veil and a statutory action under Section 33-11-240, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976 for improper distribution to the respondents as stockholders. The receiver appeals from the order of the trial judge dismissing his case on the merits. We affirm.

The controversy centers around the actions of respondents Sifly and Walter, the sole stockholders and officers of Carolina Furniture. They organized and incorporated Carolina Furniture on January 1, 1976 to engage in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Blakeley v. RabonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Baker v. CEDARWOOD ASSOCIATES, TERRACORP, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Sofi Classic S.A. de C.V. v. HurowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Dumas v. InfoSafe Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Bonaparte v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Pertuis v. Front Roe Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  5. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Myrtle Beach Golf & Yacht ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API