Legal Opinion
United States v. Alabama
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided September 13, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 83-C-1676-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION DENYING 28 U.S.C. § 144 MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY
CLEMON, District Judge.
Auburn University and State Superintendent of Education Wayne Teague, two of the sixteen defendants in this case, have filed motions seeking my recusal as judge herein. These motions were filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144 (“§ 144”) and 28 U.S.C. § 455 (“§ 455”).
The motions allege that I have “... a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party,” for § 144 purposes. They further allege that my impartiality may reasonably be questioned; that I have a personal bias or prejudice against a party and personal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. Richard R. SiblaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Birdie Mae Davis, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, Edwin Foster, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, James E. Buskey v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, Birdie Mae Davis, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, James E. Buskey, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Onan (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In the Matter of Bradford MasonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Knight v. State of Ala.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991
- United States v. State of Ala.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983