Legal Opinion

Smith v. State of California Subsequent Injuries Fund

California Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1959No. S. F. 20233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondents to pay him, as special administrator of the estate of Robert J. Kelly, compensation benefits which accrued prior to the death of Kelly.

Kelly was awarded benefits against the State of California, Subsequent Injuries Fund, on January 17, 1955. Thereafter, upon petition of the Fund, the Industrial Accident Commission granted reconsideration. Kelly died in December, 1955. The decision after reconsideration was issued February 2, 1956, affirming the award. Petitioner, as special administrator of Kelly’s estate, then applied to have himself…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hawthorn v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. STATE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warrick v. Cheatham County Highway DepartmentTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API