Legal Opinion

United States v. Justo Farias

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1974No. 71-2814, 71-2886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

First appearing before a panel of this Court on appeal from denial below of a F.R.Crim.P. 32(d) motion to withdraw a guilty plea,1 this case was affirmed in light of our earlier decision in Trujillo v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 377 F.2d 266, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 899, 88 S.Ct. 224, 19 L.Ed.2d 221. The Court, however, sua sponte took the case en banc to determine whether Trujillo should any longer be followed in its holding that the ineligibility for parole of one convicted of certain narcotics crimes is not a “consequence of a plea of guilty,” F.R.Crim. P. 11, so that on a guilty plea…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Epifanio Trujillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Hector S. Amaya v. U. S. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Aston Winter, Howard Charles Towne, Stanton Davis and William Michael ParksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Ware v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Garrett v. MathewsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1979
  4. Benjamin Herrera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Rafael Narberto Pardo Fernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API