State v. Sam
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODENBERG, Judge
Appellant Christopher Sam challenges his conviction of second-degree assault, arguing that the district court erred by giving a no-adverse-inference jury instruction without obtaining his personal consent on the record. At trial, appellant’s attorney requested the instruction on behalf of appellant, who was voluntarily absent on the final day of trial. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant was charged with first-degree aggravated robbery in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.245, subd. 1 (2014), and second-degree assault in violation of Minn. Stat. § '609.222, subd. 1 (2014). Appellant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. IhleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. GomezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. CliftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. DarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State of Minnesota v. Corey Joel EichersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.