Legal Opinion

Wells v. Blackman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 18, 1906No. 16,125PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application by E. M. Wells and others for writs of mandamus and certiorari against W. F. Blackman.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

In this case the plaintiffs’ petitory action having been dismissed, the judge of the lower court refused to fix the amount of the bond to be given by plaintiffs for a suspensive appeal, but left plaintiffs to furnish bond “according to law”; that is, to say in an amount exceeding by one-half the amount for which judgment was given. Code Prac. art. 575.

It is well settled that in such cases as this the amount of the appeal' bond must be fixed by the court. Day v. Wright & Bailey, 116 La. 961, 41 South. 223.

But the learned judge a quo answers that, taking advantage of Act No. 22, p. 25, of 1904,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Day v. BaileySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Metropolitan Land Co. v. Recorder of MortgagesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Richardson Oil Co. v. HerndonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Bickham v. BethanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  4. Continental Securities Corp. v. WetherbeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  5. Roussel v. Railways Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API