Legal Opinion

In re Joseph Uhrig Brewing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

The Joseph Uhrig Brewing Company made a voluntary assignment for the benefit of its creditors. The assignee gave notice by publication, as required by law, and was present for three consecutive days, as required by law, to pass upon demands against the estate. Daniel Lutz, on May 27, 1880, nearly three months after the days in which the assignee sat to hear claims, presented an account of $1,377, for barrels made by him for the company. Lutz *388was not notified by letter of the days for allowing demands, because the assignee did not know he was a creditor. Lutz kept a saloon. He took the two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. Atlantic & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Nay v. Han. & St. Jo. R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Rowley v. HindsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. Hammerstein v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. AlbrechtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Pattison v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API