Legal Opinion
City of San Antonio v. Rosow
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 29, 1986No. 13-86-086-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
UTTER, Justice.
The City of San Antonio appeals from a jury verdict which found that appellee was “arbitrarily and capriciously” terminated from her job. The jury awarded her $237,-335.70. The trial court ordered the City to reinstate appellee “to a position of like status and pay.” We reverse and render the judgment of the trial court.
Appellee was employed by the City as an “Administrative Assistant V.” This was a “classified” civil service position. On May 15, 1980, Mr. Fox, appellee’s supervisor, gave appellee written notice of termination, in compliance with the Municipal Civil…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Texas Health Facilities Commission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Firemen's & Policemen's Civil Service Commission v. BrinkmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Amarillo v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Lewis v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re McCall, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Rosow v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Braden, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2000
- Rosow v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.