United States v. William Aubrey Thompson, Thomas Edward Sisk and Charles Frederick Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Jr., Chief Judge.
This ease was heard en banc on April 26, 1982. The en banc hearing was preceded by a decision of a panel consisting of three thoughtful and experienced judges of this court who had reversed and vacated conditional pleas of guilty tendered by the three defendants in this case. The panel’s reasoning was that the United States Attorney’s indictment of these three individuals under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. (1976), (popularly known as RICO), was fatally defective in the fact that it alleged that…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Clarence Samuel Robinson (80-5479), James Harold Coldiron (80-5480), Charles T. Cornett (80-5481)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Donald J. BlandfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Vincent A. Cianci, Jr., Frank E. Corrente, and Richard E. AutielloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Darryl Freeman, Tyrone NettersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.