Legal Opinion

Scussel v. Kelly

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 2, 1963No. 3942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

152 So.2d 767 (1963)

George P. SCUSSEL and Louise W. Scussel, his wife, and Charlie Luckie, Jr., Relators,

v.

Richard KELLY, Respondent.

No. 3942.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 2, 1963.

Dayton, Dayton & Luckie, Dade City, and T. Paine Kelly, Jr., of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for relators.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for respondent.

ALLEN, Judge.

Pursuant to a suggestion for writ of prohibition filed by relators Scussel and Luckie, this court issued a rule nisi directed to the Honorable…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Suarez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Circuit Court for Eau Claire CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State Ex Rel. Brown v. DewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. Dickenson v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gore Newspapers Company v. TysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Gillham v. PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Wilkes v. RevelsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Eubanks v. AgnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Hudson v. MarinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API