Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Fassett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from Mississippi Circuit Court. Hon. L. L. Mack, Circuit Judge. The trust deed was notice to the world, and was a lien from May 21, 1875. The deposit with the clerk is the-filing; the endorsement simply a memorandum of time of filing. Oats v. Walls, 28 Arle., 244; 2 Washburn Peat Property, top page 591. See also Gantt’s Digest, secs. 5024, 5025.

1Opinion of the CourtEnglish, C. J.

This was a code action, in the nature of trover at common law, brought in the Circuit Court of Mississippi county, b}r W. J. Bowen, as trustee for the use of Driver & Jones, against Joseph Eassett, for the value of five bales of cotton.

- Plaintiff claimed the cotton by virtue of a deed of trust, executed to him, as trustee, on the twenty-first of May, 1875, by Esau Trust, for the use of Driver & Jones.

The deed was upon the then growing cotton crop of Trust, and was executed by him as security for $150 advanced by Driver & Jones, to enable him to make his crop.

Defendant claimed the five bales…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dean v. Planters National Bank of HughesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1959
  2. In re T. H. Bunch Commission Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1915
  3. First National Bank v. BedingfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Continental Supply Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API