Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Dagnino

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1978No. Crim. 16452Published

1Dissent

SIMS, J.*

I respectfully dissent.

The minutes reflect, “... In open court, with the jury, counsel and the defendants present, the Court instructs the juiy, the Bailiff is sworn and at 11:35 AM the jury retires for deliberations. At 12:40 the juiy recesses for lunch returning to deliberations at 1:57 PM. In open court, with counsel and the defendants present, a discussion ensues in re: communications received by the Court from the jury. Mr. Stephens and Mr. Sieff object to the manner in which the Court handled the communications from the juiy. At 5:05 PM the juiy returns to the Court with the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API