Estate of Meade v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge:
Taxpayers1 incurred legal expenses in connection with the settlement of a civil antitrust claim that had been assigned to them in pro rata shares as distribu-tees in a corporate liquidation. These cases present the question whether the legal expenses are deductible from ordinary income under section 212 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, or whether, under section 263 of the Code, they must be capitalized and offset against long-term capital gain realized by taxpayers from the settlement.
The pertinent facts have been fully stipulated. Joseph M. Meade and William S.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burnet v. LoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Helvering v. WinmillSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Lincoln Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Goldring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Wagner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- Harder Services, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
- Locke v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
- Weigl v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.