Legal Opinion

Niagara Alkali Co. v. Champion Coated Paper Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1914Published

Submission of a • controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Merrell, J.:

The admitted facts over which this controversy has arisen are as follows: The plaintiff is a domestic corporation, having its principal office at Niagara Falls, N. Y. The defendant is a foreign corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ohio, but doing business in the State of New York, having been duly authorized so to do upon compliance with the laws of this State. On July 15, 1911, at the city of Buffalo, N. Y., the parties hereto entered into a contract in writing whereby the plaintiff, therein called the “seller,” agreed to sell, and the defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Whitehead v. VanderbiltNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1881
  3. Keystone Watch Case Co. v. RomeroCity of New York Municipal Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API