Legal Opinion
De Souza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 2, 2019No. 17-100Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-100V (Filed Under Seal: December 14, 2018 | Reissued: January 2, 2019) ) Keywords: Vaccine Act; Attorneys’ Fees; EUGENIO PAULO DE SOUZA, ) Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees; Costs; ) Lodestar; Forum Fee; Abuse of Petitioner, ) Discretion; Davis County Exception. ) v. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Carol L. Gallagher, Carol L. Gallagher, Esquire LLC, Linwood, NJ, for Petitioner. Voris E. Johnson, Jr., Senior Trial Attorney, Torts Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, with whom were…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.