Legal Opinion

Grimm v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument and other-relief denied. Memorandum: Upon the return day of this article 78 proceeding the respondents without answering applied to the court by formal written motion for an order dismissing the .petition as a matter of law (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1293). In passing upon such an application the allegations of the petition must be assumed to be true in the absence of an answer. If the petition states any facts upon which the petitioner is entitled prima facie to the requested relief, then it may not be dismissed as being legally insufficient. (Matter of Felice v. Swezey, 278…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Felice v. SwezeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gray v. Canisius CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Church of Christ of Apostolic Faith, Inc. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Hondzinski v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Sirota v. SirotaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995
  5. Lack v. KreinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API