Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In the Interest of T.J.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 20, 2011No. 3D10-1111Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWells, Judge

While I concur in the decision to reverse the summary denial of the instant dependency petition for further proceedings below, I cannot agree with the conclusion that because T.J. has conducted a diligent search for her father and failed to locate him that we may presume that he is unable to care for her thereby mandating an adjudication of dependency.

This appeal stems from a dependency petition filed by the Immigrant Children’s Justice Clinic at Florida International University College of Law seeking to have seventeen year old T.J. declared dependent for the express purpose of permitting her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re TRFDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API