Winrick v. City of Warren
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtG. R. Corsiglia, J.
The defendants, City of Warren and the Civil Service Commission of the City of Warren, appeal from a judgment holding the antinepotism provision of the charter of the City of Warren unconstitutional and awarding the plaintiff, Harry Winrick, $5,000 in damages.
The case was tried to the bench on the issue of damages following a decision by the trial judge that the charter provision was unconstitutional as a matter of law. The record discloses that the plaintiff was precluded from consideration as an applicant for the positions of Janitor-Laborer and Equipment Operator I, when the top three…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hampton v. Mow Sun WongSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Detroit v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Bretz v. City of Center LineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- 77th District Judge v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Sioux City Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Townshend v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990