Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting temporary alimony and counsel fee unanimously reversed, and the motion denied on the ground that when the action was commenced the parties were still living together (Berman v. Berman, 277 App. Div. 560; Sommer v. Sommer, 285 App. Div. 809). No showing is made as to the necessity for plaintiff remaining at the matrimonial domicile while suing for a separation. It is immaterial that since the commencement of the action the wife has removed herself from the marital residence. It is noted further that, on this record, plaintiff wife has failed to make out a proper ease for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sommer v. SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Duffy v. DuffyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Schultz v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  4. Takagi v. TakagiNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API