Legal Opinion
Cadro v. Vredenburgh
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 15, 1932No. 213PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The libelants were the crew! of the steam tug John E. Berwind, and filed a libel for seamen’s wages against the tug, O’Boyle, the registered owner, and Vredenburgh, alleging that the tug was operated by O’Boyle and Vredenburgh as agent of O’Boyle. Vredenburgh was not served with process. The District Court granted a decree to libelants against the tug and O’Boyle, from which O’Boyle now appeals. There is no doubt that libelants were entitled to recover against the tug, and the only question before us is whether they had enforceable claims against O’Boyle…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Insurance Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Cox v. . Lykes BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- MacY v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. A. L. Burbank & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Mattox v. News Syndicate Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Fink v. Shepard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sims v. Marine Catering Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Williams v. Wilmington Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.