C. B. Alsbrook v. AR Commission on Law
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Christopher Alsbrook brought this suit against his employer, the City of Mau-melle, Arkansas (the City); the State of Arkansas (the State); the Arkansas Commission on Law Enforcement Standards and Training (ACLEST); and the commissioners of ACLEST, in their official capacities, under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He also brought claims against the commissioners, in their individual capacities, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The State, ACLEST,' and the commissioners (collectively, appellants), moved for summary judgment asserting that…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alsbrook v. City Of MaumelleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999