Lunacy of Raeder
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 27, July T., 1894, by J. A. Raeder, from order of C. P. Luzerne Co., May T., 1884, No. 472, sustaining exceptions to report of auditor. Exceptions to auditor’s report. The auditor, A. C. Campbell, Esq., reported the facts to be as follows : “ In proceedings No. 472, May term, 1884, Peter Raeder, on May 12, 1884, was declared, by the court of common pleas of Luzerne county, a lunatic, and on May 24, 1884, Peter Seible and Chas.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 27, July T., 1894, by J. A. Raeder, from order of C. P. Luzerne Co., May T., 1884, No. 472, sustaining exceptions to report of auditor. Exceptions to auditor’s report. The auditor, A. C. Campbell, Esq., reported the facts to be as follows : “ In proceedings No. 472, May term, 1884, Peter Raeder, on May 12, 1884, was declared, by the court of common pleas of Luzerne county, a lunatic, and on May 24, 1884, Peter Seible and Chas. H. Gardner, were appointed a committee of said Peter Raeder, lunatic. “ On Oct. 6, 1890, Chas. H. Gardner, surviving committee, filed his first and partial…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
There appears to be nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications of error. The questions therein presented are sufficiently answered by the learned president of the common pleas in his opinion sustaining exceptions to the auditor’s report.
On that opinion the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Kellerman's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Peters's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Simco's Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1925