Legal Opinion

Sylvia Richland v. Lou R. Crandall, and George A. Fuller Company, Bclm, Inc., Cloyce K. Box

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 5, 1965No. 29792_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

On the argument of this and the companion appeal Klastorin v. Roth, et al., 353 F.2d 182 (2 Cir. 1965), we were advised that these two cases, arising out of the same transactions, have been consolidated by the District Court for trial, have been assigned to a Rule 2 Judge 1 and both cases will be tried shortly.

The relief which was sought by the motion for a temporary injunction 2 and denied by Judge McGohey would be impossible of fulfillment for the events which Richland sought to restrain have already occurred. The appeal is therefore moot. 3 See Sawyer v. Pioneer Mill Co., 300 F.2d 200 (9th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. Pioneer Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. M. Klastorin v. Clyde C. Roth, and George A. Fuller CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richland v. CrandallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. The Bank of New York Company, Inc. v. Northeast Bancorp, Inc. First Fidelity Bancorporation Frank J. Kugler, Jr. George R. Kabureck and Peter v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Holt v. Katy Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. M. Klastorin v. Clyde C. Roth, and George A. Fuller CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API